<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hostmedic &#187; fiber</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hostmedic.com/tag/fiber/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hostmedic.com</link>
	<description>Emergency Medicine for Hosting &#38; Server Admins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 04:51:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fiber Optic Cable is overrated.</title>
		<link>http://www.hostmedic.com/admin/network_administration/fiber-optic-cable-is-overrated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hostmedic.com/admin/network_administration/fiber-optic-cable-is-overrated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Kelley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Network Admin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cat6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cat6a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hostmedic.com/?p=565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While connecting two buildings together &#8211; with roughly 300 foot of distance between each other a client recently asked if we should use fiber for the entire run. While I wouldn&#8217;t recommend running fiber to every port on a network because it is unnecessary and expensive, fiber does make an excellent backbone cable.  With the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hostmedic.com%2Fadmin%2Fnetwork_administration%2Ffiber-optic-cable-is-overrated%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hostmedic.com%2Fadmin%2Fnetwork_administration%2Ffiber-optic-cable-is-overrated%2F&amp;source=churchmedic&amp;style=normal&amp;service=TinyURL.com&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://ep.yimg.com/ca/I/broadbandutopia_2072_20125241" alt="" width="178" height="195" />While connecting two buildings together &#8211; with roughly 300 foot of distance between each other a client recently asked if we should use fiber for the entire run.</p>
<div>
<p>While I wouldn&#8217;t recommend running fiber to every port on a network because it is unnecessary and expensive, fiber does make an excellent backbone cable.  With the changes in cabling however &#8211; from Cat5e to now Cat6 and cat6A &#8211; the cost may not be worth it unless of course &#8211; you need to go over 100 meters (328 feet)</p>
<p>So &#8211; a few notes about Cat5 and Cat6 cabling</p>
<ul>
<li>Most Ethernet wiring is currently done using the T568B standard</li>
<li>CAT5 wiring uses the smallest gauge wires, which are stranded. Generally it used for data speeds up to 100 Mb/sec. However, the increased speeds and loads of modern LANs place a strain on the characteristics of this wire. It is no longer recommended as the wiring standard.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>CAT5e wiring was recently used as the wiring standard, and uses a slightly higher gauge solid wire. This enables the transmission of data at 250 Mb/sec to 1000 Mb/sec (Gigabit), and is generally in use by all new LANs.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>CAT6 wiring uses even higher gauge wires. It is preferred for Gigabit speeds (1000 Mb/sec to 10,000 Mb/sec), especially over long distances.   <strong><em>All</em> </strong>components of a CAT6 installation such as patch cables, jacks, patch panels, etc must meet CAT6 specs to achieve the higher performance level</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>Fiber optic cables theoretically have the highest transmission rate however for shorter (up to 100 meter) runs &#8211; they are expensive and require special handling.   Until recently routers to connect to fiber optic cables were not readily available.  There is a downside to optical fiber and that is cost. A network utilizing fiber will typically cost <em>twice </em>as much as a CAT6 installation.   With the Cat6A pushing the barrier of 10GBPS in many environments &#8211; one should ask the question &#8211; is Fiber overrrated for what I am trying to do ?</div>
<div>Chances are &#8211; if your going from server to server &#8211; or from desk to desk &#8211; the answer is yes.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hostmedic.com/admin/network_administration/fiber-optic-cable-is-overrated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

