<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iscsi ≠Speed when it comes to DataBases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hostmedic.com/admin/storage/iscsi-%e2%89%a0speed-when-it-comes-to-databases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hostmedic.com/admin/storage/iscsi-%e2%89%a0speed-when-it-comes-to-databases/</link>
	<description>Emergency Medicine for Hosting &#38; Server Admins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:00:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.hostmedic.com/admin/storage/iscsi-%e2%89%a0speed-when-it-comes-to-databases/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hostmedic.com/?p=537#comment-324</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what version of ESX your client is using. In ESX4, you can use multipathing to increase bandwidth. In my home test lab, I have 2 active path between initiator and target and I&#039;m getting 250MB/s, if I add one more path, I can get 375MB/s and so on.

Don&#039;t bother with LAG, it doesn&#039;t work the same way. In LAG, point to point is limited to single interface speed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what version of ESX your client is using. In ESX4, you can use multipathing to increase bandwidth. In my home test lab, I have 2 active path between initiator and target and I&#8217;m getting 250MB/s, if I add one more path, I can get 375MB/s and so on.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t bother with LAG, it doesn&#8217;t work the same way. In LAG, point to point is limited to single interface speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Richthorski</title>
		<link>http://www.hostmedic.com/admin/storage/iscsi-%e2%89%a0speed-when-it-comes-to-databases/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Richthorski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hostmedic.com/?p=537#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Awesome amount of information in here - 
I have not gone the route of vmWare yet - mainly due to the cost 
however with my current virtualization provider unsure of what they are going to do w/ their current hypervisor I am going to try out vmware 

Any other suggestions where I should begin ?

I am interested in using vmware and isci - but the lack of speed on databases seem to be the same as w/ the openvz stuff over isci 

hmmm - i just think virtualization all together for mySQL is the mistake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome amount of information in here &#8211;<br />
I have not gone the route of vmWare yet &#8211; mainly due to the cost<br />
however with my current virtualization provider unsure of what they are going to do w/ their current hypervisor I am going to try out vmware </p>
<p>Any other suggestions where I should begin ?</p>
<p>I am interested in using vmware and isci &#8211; but the lack of speed on databases seem to be the same as w/ the openvz stuff over isci </p>
<p>hmmm &#8211; i just think virtualization all together for mySQL is the mistake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

